Trump’s China Visit: Big on Pageantry, Short on Specifics, Long on Consequence
IntroductionFor three days in May 2026, the most consequential bilateral relationship in the world was conducted in person, on Chinese soil, for the first time in nearly nine years. President Donald Trump’s state visit to China — the first by an American president since his own November 2017 trip during his first term — was equal parts diplomatic theatre and strategic test, wrapped in the symbolism of Zhongnanhai gardens, Peking duck, and the careful grammar of superpower summitry.Trump called the trip “incredible,” but while it was big on pageantry, it fell short on concrete agreements. Still, Trump hailed business deals for American companies and farmers, while Chinese leader Xi Jinping touted a new era for the stability of China-US relations.The gap between those two descriptions — one transactional, one strategic — captures the essential character of what happened in Beijing. Enough was accomplished to make the visit a diplomatic success by the standards of the moment. Not enough was accomplished to resolve the crises that brought both leaders to the table.The Road to Beijing: How the Visit Was MadeThe roots of this visit go back to the Busan Summit of October 30, 2025, held on the sidelines of a regional gathering in South Korea. Trump and Xi held their first meeting during Trump’s second presidency at the Busan Summit. At the meeting, Trump announced plans to visit China in April of the following year and invited Xi to visit the United States at an appropriate time.The April timeline did not hold. The state visit was planned for the first week of April, but the meeting was postponed to May due to the 2026 Iran war. The conflict that had closed the Strait of Hormuz and sent oil prices to record highs became both the reason for delay and the dominant agenda item when the visit finally happened.The diplomatic preparation was extensive. On April 16, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Beijing had provided high-level assurances to the White House that it would not send weapons to Iran, explicitly ruling out the potential transfer of surface-to-air missiles to the Iranian military. Hegseth attributed this breakthrough to the “strong and direct relationship” between President Trump and Xi Jinping. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in February and held a further phone call on April 30 to prepare the ground for the summit.The Chinese Foreign Ministry confirmed Trump would pay a state visit to China from May 13 to 15 at President Xi Jinping’s invitation. It marked the first visit to China by an American president in almost nine years, coming at a time of heightened bilateral tensions over a range of issues, including trade, technology, and defence, and intersecting with a precarious US-Iran ceasefire and a dual blockade of the Strait of Hormuz that was driving up energy prices and weighing on global economic growth.The Arrival: Red Carpets and 300 Waving ChildrenBeijing rolled out the literal and figurative red carpet for Trump as he arrived in China on Wednesday evening local time. Three hundred Chinese children dressed in blue and white uniforms waved American and Chinese flags as Trump descended the steps of Air Force One. He was also joined on the tarmac by his son, Eric Trump, and daughter-in-law, Lara Trump.Trump was greeted at the airport by Chinese Vice President Han Zheng, Chinese Ambassador to the US Xie Feng, Executive Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu, and US Ambassador to China David Perdue, as well as a military honour guard, a military band, and around 300 Chinese students waving Chinese and American flags. Trump and his entourage then boarded a motorcade to the Four Seasons Beijing Hotel.The visual grammar of this welcome was deliberate. Han Zheng, as China’s Vice President, is a figure of considerable standing, and his presence on the tarmac signalled the importance Beijing attached to the visit. The children chanting in Mandarin “Welcome, welcome, enthusiastically welcome” was choreography, but choreography that conveyed a message: China wanted this summit to succeed, or at least to be seen to succeed.The last time Trump visited Beijing — in November 2017 during his first term — he was given a tour of the Forbidden City and a dinner inside it, an honour granted to no other foreign leader since 1949. It remains to be seen whether this trip matched the pomp and circumstance of last time, but already there were significant events on Trump’s schedule: a welcome ceremony, a tour of the Temple of Heaven, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and a state banquet.The Summit: The Great Hall, the Temple, and ZhongnanhaiAt 10 AM, Trump arrived at the Great Hall of the People, where he was greeted by Xi Jinping and received an opening ceremony featuring the national anthems of the United States and China, after which they inspected troops of the People’s Liberation Army and then greeted children waving Chinese and American flags.The formal bilateral meetings between Trump and Xi took place across two days, with the agenda covering trade and economic relations, the Iran war and the Strait of Hormuz, Taiwan, North Korea, rare earths and technology, and the broader structure of the bilateral relationship.On the final day, Trump headed back to the US after having lunch with Xi at Zhongnanhai, a rare visit to the Beijing compound where top Chinese officials live and work. Xi said it was meant to reciprocate Trump’s hosting him at Mar-a-Lago during his first term. “It means that China attaches great importance to this visit by President Trump to China,” said one analyst who attended the dinner banquet. “It also reflects the positive personal relationship between the two leaders.”At their last meeting, the two leaders toured the gardens at Zhongnanhai, with Trump admiring the roses. “These are the most beautiful roses anyone’s ever seen,” Trump said. Xi said he would share some Chinese rose seeds for Trump to have planted in the White House Rose Garden.The menu of the state banquet was circulated online afterward. It included cold
BRICS Foreign Ministers’ Meeting, New Delhi: A Bloc Divided by the War It Could Not Name
IntroductionWhen India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar took the chair at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, he was presiding over the most consequential BRICS Foreign Ministers’ Meeting since the bloc’s expansion. Eleven member states sat around the table. The agenda was India’s: global institutional reform, South-South cooperation, economic resilience, and the priorities of the developing world. The problem that arrived uninvited was the Iran war.Top diplomats from BRICS nations, including rivals Iran and the United Arab Emirates, failed to issue a joint statement after a two-day meeting in New Delhi, exposing divisions within the bloc over the war in Iran. Host nation India instead released a Chair’s Statement and Outcome Document, saying there were “differing views among some members” as regards the situation in the West Asia and Middle East region.The inability to produce a joint declaration — the standard diplomatic deliverable of any ministerial meeting — was not a procedural failure. It was a substantive one, and it went to the heart of what BRICS is, what it has become after its 2024-2025 expansion, and whether it can function as a coherent voice for the Global South when its own members are on opposite sides of an active war.The Meeting: Who Was There and What Was PlannedThe meeting was held at Bharat Mandapam under India’s 2026 chairship. It followed a preparatory ministerial held on September 26, 2025, on the sidelines of UNGA 80, where India as the incoming chair had set out its agenda.Those in attendance included Indonesia’s Foreign Minister Sugiono, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, South Africa’s Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, Brazil’s Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira, Egypt’s Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, Ethiopia’s Foreign Minister Gedion Timothewos, China’s Ambassador to India Xu Feihong, and UAE’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Khalifa bin Shaheen Al Marar. Uganda’s Foreign Minister Odondo Jeje Abubakha was also present as a representative of the bloc’s outreach partners.India’s intended agenda was carefully constructed to avoid precisely the kind of confrontation that ultimately occurred. India’s chairship theme — Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability — framed the meeting. Ministers reaffirmed BRICS’s three pillars: political and security cooperation, economic and financial cooperation, and people-to-people exchanges. They repeated the bloc’s commitment to openness, equality, and consensus.What the Chair’s Statement CoveredDespite the headline failure to produce a joint declaration, the Chair’s Statement and Outcome Document ran to 63 paragraphs covering a wide range of issues where agreement was possible.The Chair’s Statement gave most space to reform of global institutions: the United Nations and its Security Council, the IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO. Members argued that present structures do not reflect contemporary realities and favour developed Western powers. The statement reiterated support for a multipolar order and for greater representation of Africa, Asia, and Latin America in global decision-making.On economic matters, the ministers called for resilient supply chains, fair trade, reform of the global financial architecture, expansion of local-currency trade, and stronger South-South cooperation. The bloc opposed unilateral sanctions, protectionism, and trade barriers, and backed a rules-based multilateral trading system centred on the WTO.The document also covered cooperation on artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure, cybersecurity, climate change, energy transition, health security, food security, and innovation-led growth. Initiatives endorsed included the BRICS Grain Exchange, cross-border payment systems, and a stronger role for the New Development Bank and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement.On geopolitics, the ministers discussed West Asia, Gaza, Lebanon, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, but could not agree on language for the Iran war. The text instead set out general principles: diplomacy, humanitarian access, ceasefires, protection of civilians, and respect for international law. The ministers strongly condemned terrorism, including the Pahalgam attack of April 22, 2025, and called for closer counter-terrorism cooperation.On Palestine specifically, the Chair’s Statement had four paragraphs on Palestine, including one recognising a two-state solution with East Jerusalem as the capital of an independent Palestine. The ministers recalled that the Gaza Strip is an inseparable part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory and reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including the right to an independent State of Palestine.The Fault Line: Iran vs. the UAE Inside the Same BlocThe meeting’s collapse into a Chair’s Statement rather than a joint declaration had a specific cause, a specific pair of actors, and a specific set of paragraphs that could not be reconciled.The central dispute was over how BRICS should describe the war involving Iran, the US, and Israel. Iran wanted the grouping to condemn US-Israeli attacks on it, while accusing the UAE — a fellow BRICS member and US ally — of direct involvement in military operations against Iran.On the first day of talks, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called upon BRICS member states and the international community to explicitly condemn violations of international law by the United States and Israel, including their illegal aggression against Iran, to prevent the politicisation of international institutions, and to take concrete action to halt warmongering and bring an end to the impunity of those who violated the UN Charter.Araghchi explicitly accused the UAE of being “directly involved in the aggression against my country.” Tehran views the UAE and Saudi Arabia not as neutral neighbours but as “hostile bases” because they host critical US military infrastructure and failed to condemn the initial US-Israeli strikes on Iran.The UAE’s response was unequivocal. UAE’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Khalifa bin Shaheen Al Marar categorically rejected the allegations levelled by Iran and condemned what he termed “unjustified attacks” on civilian infrastructure. He defended UAE sovereignty against Iran’s charges in his national statement. “Despite numerous international and regional resolutions and condemnations, Iran has continued its terrorist attacks against the UAE and other countries in the region, in clear disregard of the international consensus,” he said.It is learnt that Iran had an issue specifically with paragraphs 26 and 29 of the proposed joint statement — the paragraphs covering Palestine and the Red Sea respectively. However, Araghchi, without naming the UAE, blamed a country
BRICS India 2026: New Logo, Theme and Website Launched as Chairship Preparations Get Underway
New Delhi, India, has officially launched the logo, theme and official website for its year-long BRICS Chairship in 2026, marking the start of its leadership of the influential multilateral grouping that brings together emerging markets and developing economies. The unveiling took place in New Delhi on January 13, 2026, with External Affairs Minister Dr S. Jaishankar presiding over the ceremony.A Symbol of Unity and Shared AspirationsThe newly showcased BRICS India 2026 logo draws its inspiration from the lotus flower, a symbol deeply rooted in Indian culture and widely associated with resilience, renewal and cultural heritage.The design incorporates petals in the vibrant colours of all BRICS member countries, highlighting the unity of diverse nations under a common purpose. At the centre of the emblem is the Namaste gesture, symbolising respect, warmth of partnership and a commitment to harmonious collaboration among nations.Accompanying the visual identity is the official theme for India’s chairship: “Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability”. The theme reflects a people-centric and humanity-first approach, emphasising inclusive development, practical cooperation and mutual support. “The Indian government has said this vision is inspired by broader goals of shared growth and equitable progress across regions.”A Central Digital PlatformAlongside the logo and theme, India also launched the official BRICS 2026 website, brics2026.gov.in. The digital platform is expected to serve as a central source of information on BRICS initiatives, meetings, official documents and events scheduled during India’s chairship.The website is designed to enhance transparency, engagement and communication both among member countries and with the global public.Officials highlighted that the platform’s easy access and regular updates will allow stakeholders from across member nations, partner states and civil society to stay informed about key developments and collaborative efforts under the BRICS framework.Context and SignificanceIndia assumed the BRICS Chairship on January 1, 2026, coinciding with the 20th anniversary of the BRICS grouping, which was first formed in 2006 to foster cooperation among key emerging economies. Over the years, BRICS has expanded beyond its five founding members, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia as full members, significantly broadening its global footprint.The launch ceremony in New Delhi was attended by senior officials from the Ministry of External Affairs and representatives from diplomatic missions, underlining the importance India places on using its chairship to strengthen global dialogue and cooperation.Looking Ahead: The Final InsightWith its theme focused on resilience and sustainability, India’s BRICS agenda in 2026 is expected to tackle key global challenges, including economic recovery, technological innovation, climate action and people-to-people exchanges.As preparations continue, the logo and website launch mark a pivotal early step in shaping India’s leadership year and the broader narrative of BRICS cooperation on the world stage.